Here and There – A New Jersey Blogger on Family, Travel, Photography, Movie and Product Reviews Rotating Header Image

Mandatory Insurance Doesn’t Mean Mandatory Claim Processing

front end crown vic crash

Back in 2005, my car tire had a blowout. The car went out of control and careened into a roadside wall of cement. The car didn’t make it, was towed away and eventually totalled. An ambulance rushed me to a nearby reputable trauma center. After an ER visit, four days of hospitalization, many tests and specialist referrals, I was released with medication and instructions to continue with local doctors.

To this day in spite of residual aches and pains, I feel lucky. My son ET who was napping in the back seat escaped with only a few scratches. No other car got involved in the chain of events. I am alive today. However, I still cannot believe the amount of paperwork and bills that followed the incident. Along with my own personal affordable dental plan, vision plan, prescription plan, and medical plan, I had full MV coverage in our no fault insurance state.

The insurance company claimed it was not responsible for many of the bills incurred and I was liable for the payments. Its justification was that other pre-existing conditions were treated as part of the accident workup. It really makes one wonder.

0 Comments on “Mandatory Insurance Doesn’t Mean Mandatory Claim Processing”

Leave a Comment

Please include your real name or your comment may be confused as spam and deleted with the spam.